A judge may decide to publish a statement after passing sentence on an offender in cases where there is particular public interest; where a case has legal significance; or where providing the reasons for the decision might assist public understanding.
Please note that statements may include graphic details of offences when it is necessary to fully explain the reasons behind a sentencing decision.
Follow us if you wish to receive alerts as soon as statements are published.
Once charges are spent, any statement in relation to them is removed and cannot be provided or acknowledged. Statements published before the launch of the website may be available on request. Please email email@example.com.
The independence of the judiciary is essential to safeguard people’s rights under law - enabling judges to make decisions impartially based solely on evidence and law, without interference or influence from the government or politicians.
When deciding a sentence, a judge must deal with the offence that the offender has been convicted of, taking into account the unique circumstances of each particular case. The judge will carefully consider the facts that are presented to the Court by both the prosecution and by the defence.
Read more about victims of crime and sentencing.
HMA v Eric Lavender
Oct 15, 2021
On sentencing Sheriff Kenneth Campbell QC made the following statement in court:
"On 9 September, you pled guilty to a charge of embezzlement of £38,960.28 from your former employer, Interserve, between 1 February 2016 and 10 February 2017.
I will impose a Community Payback Order (CPO) with a number of elements:
- a supervision requirement of 18 months
- a requirement to carry out 200 hours unpaid work in 18 months, which I have modified from 300 hours to reflect the timing of the plea.
I will impose a compensation order for payment to your former employer, Interserve, in the amount of £38,960. I will submissions about a schedule for payment."
October 15, 2021