A judge may decide to publish a statement after passing sentence on an offender in cases where there is particular public interest; where a case has legal significance; or where providing the reasons for the decision might assist public understanding.
Please note that statements may include graphic details of offences when it is necessary to fully explain the reasons behind a sentencing decision.
Follow us if you wish to receive alerts as soon as statements are published.
Once charges are spent, any statement in relation to them is removed and cannot be provided or acknowledged. Statements published before the launch of the website may be available on request. Please email email@example.com.
The independence of the judiciary is essential to safeguard people’s rights under law - enabling judges to make decisions impartially based solely on evidence and law, without interference or influence from the government or politicians.
When deciding a sentence, a judge must deal with the offence that the offender has been convicted of, taking into account the unique circumstances of each particular case. The judge will carefully consider the facts that are presented to the Court by both the prosecution and by the defence.
Read more about victims of crime and sentencing.
HMA v Garry Jordan and Steven McCallum
Oct 6, 2022
On sentencing Lord Arthurson made the following statement in court:
"Garry Jordan and Steven McCallum, at Glasgow High Court on 18 August 2022, on the first day of the float period of a dedicated floating trial diet, each of you pled guilty to a single charge of being concerned in the supply of the class A controlled drug cocaine.
You had utilised the EncroChat platform in respect of your involvement in the supply of cocaine over the period 27 March to 7 May 2020. The agreed narrative states that you had a logistics role at a mid level in the hierarchy of an organised crime group, albeit that you dispute that through your senior counsel. Mr McCallum, you were the front seat passenger in the vehicle and the period of your own involvement in this crime has been restricted to a single day, namely 29 May 2020.
As a result of the folly of your decision you would miss the formative years of your newly born child’s life. Mr McCallum, your counsel submitted that you were a single occasion single day courier, who committed this crime for a one-off payment and with no real understanding of the value of the drugs being transported. You too will be separated from your family and child, and you have already experienced that difficulty during your remand.
6 October 2022