SENTENCING STATEMENTS

 

A judge may decide to publish a statement after passing sentence on an offender in cases where there is particular public interest; where a case has legal significance; or where providing the reasons for the decision might assist public understanding.

Please note that statements may include graphic details of offences when it is necessary to fully explain the reasons behind a sentencing decision.  

Follow us if you wish to receive alerts as soon as statements are published. 

Once charges are spent, any statement in relation to them is removed and cannot be provided or acknowledged. Statements published before the launch of the website may be available on request. Please email judicialcomms@scotcourts.gov.uk

The independence of the judiciary is essential to safeguard people’s rights under law - enabling judges to make decisions impartially based solely on evidence and law, without interference or influence from the government or politicians.

When deciding a sentence, a judge must deal with the offence that the offender has been convicted of, taking into account the unique circumstances of each particular case. The judge will carefully consider the facts that are presented to the Court by both the prosecution and by the defence.

For more information about how judges decide sentences; what sentences are available; and matters such as temporary release, see the independent Scottish Sentencing Council website.

Read more about victims of crime and sentencing.

Read more about civil judgments.

HMA v William Budge

 

Feb 5, 2025

At the High Court in Edinburgh, William Budge was sentenced to 7 years and 4 months' imprisonment after the offender pled guilty to attempted murder.


On sentencing, Lord Lake said:

"William Budge, you pled guilty to three offences – a single instance of assault in 2016 / 2017, a course of domestic abuse over a period of more than 5 years and attempted murder of your wife.

Your conduct in the attempted murder was caught on video and is quite horrifying to watch. You used your car as a weapon and drove it at and over your wife. Having done this, you made a U-Turn and went back and drove over her a second time

The callousness and cruelty of your acts are astonishing.

There can be no doubt that you showed complete indifference as to whether your conduct killed her.

Having seen the footage, as was recognised by Mr Stewart on your behalf, it is remarkable that your wife was not killed.

She suffered serious life threatening injuries including internal injuries and skeletal injuries which meant she was in hospital for two months

I have considered the victim impact statement from your wife and it is clear that she still suffers both physically and mentally and, although she has taken advantage of various therapies and treatments, it seems she will continue to do so for some time.

All this is aggravated by the fact it was an attack on your partner and I will reflect that in the sentence.

Obviously the last charge is by far the most serious but that should not undermine the seriousness of the other two

As Mr Stewart pointed out, you have no previous convictions. You suffered poor mental health prior to the attack. You have accepted your guilt and expressed remorse. You have pled guilty at an early stage avoiding the further trauma for your wife and family that would flow from a trial and the preparation for it.

Regardless of this, it is necessary that the sentence should mark the abhorrence of your behaviour and its serious consequences.

In relation to charge 1 of assault, had there been no plea the sentence would be 9 months which is increased from 6 months to mark the domestic aggravation. This is modified back to 6 months to reflect your guilty plea.

In relation to charge 2, if there had been no plea, the sentence would be 12 months but this is modified to 8 months to reflect the plea.

In relation to the charge of attempted murder, looking at the situation as if there had been no plea and there was no domestic aggravation, I would have imposed a sentence of 8 years. The domestic aggravation means this should be increased to 11 years. That is in turn modified to reflect the guilty plea to become 7 years and 4 months.

These sentences will be concurrent and are all backdated to 16 April 2024.

Finally I make a Non-Harassment Order prohibiting you from contacting or attempting to contact your wife, directly or indirectly, by any means for a period 15 years."